Deandra Dottin and Shemaine Campbelle put on 63 for West Indies Women’s first wicket. For a few overs, chasing 180 looked entirely plausible.
Then India’s spinners took over. Three wickets fell for just 18 runs, and the chase never recovered even though a late flurry from the tail made the final margin look tighter than the match actually was.
This India Women’s National Cricket Team vs West Indies Women match scorecard covers the 5th Match of the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup Warm-up Matches 2026 at Cardiff. It was only a warm-up game, but it gave both sides a genuinely useful preview of what they’ll need to fix or repeat once the tournament begins.
Match in 30 Seconds
| Detail | Match information |
|---|---|
| Match | 5th Match, ICC Women’s T20 World Cup Warm-up Matches 2026 |
| Venue | Sophia Gardens, Cardiff |
| Date | 8 June 2026 |
| Toss | West Indies Women won the toss and elected to field first |
| India Women score | 179/8 in 20 overs |
| West Indies Women score | 153/8 in 20 overs |
| Result | India Women won by 26 runs |
| Standout performers | Bharti Fulmali — 56* (40) for India; Shreyanka Patil — 4/36 |
The one-line story: Bharti Fulmali’s unbeaten 56 pushed India to a genuinely strong 179/8, and although Dottin and Campbelle gave West Indies a promising start in the chase, India’s spin pairing of Shreyanka Patil and Radha Yadav closed the door with seven combined wickets.
What people think is that a 26-run margin in a 20-over match suggests a comfortable, one-sided contest throughout.
The reality is more layered: West Indies were 63/0 and genuinely in the contest before India’s spinners took control the final margin reflects the second half of the chase, not the whole story.
India Women’s National Cricket Team vs West Indies Women Match Scorecard
India Women’s innings: 179/8 in 20 overs
| Batter | Runs | Balls | Notable detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smriti Mandhana | 39 | 23 | Set the tone at the top of the order |
| Bharti Fulmali* | 56 | 40 | Unbeaten, anchored the innings through the middle overs |
| Total | 179/8 | 20 overs |
West Indies bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Runs | Wickets | Economy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afy Fletcher | 4 | 23 | 4 | 5.75 |
| Aaliyah Alleyne | 2 | 17 | 1 | 8.50 |
West Indies Women’s innings: 153/8 in 20 overs
| Batter | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s | Dismissal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deandra Dottin | 49 | 44 | — | — | lbw |
| Shemaine Campbelle | 25 | 22 | — | — | retired out |
| Q Joseph | 5 | 4 | — | — | bowled |
| J Claxton | 6 | 4 | — | — | caught |
| A Alleyne | 13 | 7 | — | — | caught |
| C Henry | 1 | 2 | — | — | caught |
| J Glasgow | 19 | 18 | — | — | caught |
| Zaida James | 1 | 2 | — | — | bowled |
| Shawnisha Hector | 19 | 11 | — | — | not out |
| Afy Fletcher | 7 | 6 | — | — | not out |
| Extras | 8 | — | — | — | 1 b, 7 w |
| Total | 153/8 | 20 overs |
Fall of wickets: 63/1 (Dottin’s stand ends, following Campbelle’s retirement), 75/2 (Q Joseph), 81/3 (J Claxton), 97/4 (A Alleyne), 102/5 (C Henry), 103/6 (J Glasgow), 113/7 (Zaida James), 144/8 (S Hector).
India bowling figures
| Bowler | Overs | Runs | Wickets | Economy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shafali Verma | 2 | 9 | 0 | 4.50 |
| Renuka Singh | 4 | 30 | 0 | 7.50 |
| K Gaud | 4 | 43 | 0 | 10.75 |
| Shree Charani | 2 | 9 | 0 | 4.50 |
| Radha Yadav | 4 | 25 | 3 | 6.25 |
| Shreyanka Patil | 4 | 36 | 4 | 9.00 |
Read Also:- Mumbai Indians vs Royal Challengers Bengaluru: The Full 2026 Head-to-Head
Highlights and Key Moments
1. Mandhana’s brisk start and Fulmali’s finishing innings
Smriti Mandhana’s 39 off 23 balls gave India exactly the platform they wanted, before Bharti Fulmali took over and anchored the innings through to 179/8 with an unbeaten 56 off 40 balls.
What most people miss: Mandhana and Fulmali played genuinely different roles rather than simply “both batting well.” Mandhana’s job was tempo-setting in the powerplay; Fulmali’s was converting that platform into a defendable total through the middle overs, when Afy Fletcher’s 4/23 threatened to slow India down significantly.
2. Dottin and Campbelle’s promising 63-run opening stand
West Indies began their chase strongly, with Deandra Dottin and Shemaine Campbelle putting on 63 for the first wicket. Campbelle was retired out during this stand, a tactical decision that briefly disrupted the momentum before India’s bowlers capitalised fully.
Counterintuitive point: a promising opening stand followed by a voluntary retirement is an unusual passage of play. Whatever the tactical reasoning, the disruption to West Indies’ rhythm at exactly this point coincided with India’s spinners beginning to assert control timing that mattered more than the retirement decision itself.
3. The three-wickets-for-18-runs window that ended the chase
After the promising start, West Indies lost three wickets for just 18 runs, sliding from 63/1 to 81/3. Shreyanka Patil and Radha Yadav were central to this collapse, combining for wickets that turned a competitive chase into a genuine uphill battle.
This is where things go wrong for a chasing side that started well: a strong opening stand creates false security if the middle order isn’t prepared for a sudden shift in bowling pressure. West Indies’ batters who followed Dottin and Campbelle were not able to immediately adjust to the turn and control India’s spinners were offering.
4. A late flurry that made the margin look closer than it was
Shawnisha Hector’s unbeaten 19 off 11 and a small partnership with the lower order pushed West Indies from a heavier-looking defeat to a final score of 153/8 a 26-run margin that undersells how comfortably India controlled the middle overs of the chase.
Bold opinion: final margins in T20 cricket can be genuinely misleading when a chasing side’s tail hits out after the game is already decided. Readers judging this result purely by “26 runs” without looking at the phase-by-phase breakdown would significantly underestimate how in-control India actually were for most of the second innings.
Player Performance Breakdown
Bharti Fulmali: the innings that built a defendable total
Fulmali’s unbeaten 56 off 40 balls was the difference between a good total and a genuinely defendable one. She batted through the innings’ most difficult phase, when Afy Fletcher’s disciplined bowling had slowed India’s scoring rate.
Original observation: Fulmali’s role in this innings is a useful reminder that “finishing” in T20 cricket doesn’t always mean explosive late hitting. Her value came from simply staying at the crease and rotating strike while wickets fell around her the least glamorous, most necessary job in a batting innings under pressure.
Smriti Mandhana: setting the tone at the top
Mandhana’s 39 off 23 balls gave India’s innings early tempo. As India’s vice-captain, she has spoken publicly about the responsibility she and Shafali Verma carry at the top of the order heading into the World Cup, and this innings reflected exactly that kind of front-foot intent.
Practical lesson for opening batters: a 23-ball 39 doesn’t need to be a match-defining score to be valuable its real function was removing pressure from the middle order before Fulmali had to play her anchoring role.
Shreyanka Patil and Radha Yadav: India’s spin partnership
Patil’s 4/36 and Yadav’s 3/25 combined for seven of West Indies’ eight wickets. Their partnership worked because they offered genuinely different challenges Yadav’s left-arm angle and Patil’s off-spin variations gave batters no consistent read against India’s middle-overs attack.
Common mistake in analysis: judging Patil’s figures purely by her economy of 9.00, which looks expensive in isolation. Her four wickets, arriving at exactly the moments West Indies needed stability, were far more valuable than a cheap, wicketless spell would have been.
Deandra Dottin: West Indies’ best individual effort
Dottin’s 49 off 44 balls was West Indies’ most substantial individual contribution, anchoring the early stages of the chase before India’s spinners took control in the middle overs.
What people think vs reality: a near-fifty from your most experienced batter often gets read as a sign the team performed well collectively. Here, Dottin’s innings mainly reflected the strength of the platform she and Campbelle built together once she was dismissed, West Indies’ remaining batters could not sustain anything close to the same tempo.
Analysis: Why West Indies Fell Short
A good start that lacked a second act
What people think: a 63-run opening stand while chasing 180 signals a team well-placed to complete the chase.
Reality: West Indies needed either that partnership to continue much longer, or an immediate second partnership of similar scale, to keep pace with the required rate. Instead, the very next phase of the innings produced three wickets for 18 runs the exact opposite of what a strong start should lead to.
India’s middle-overs spin plan
Patil and Yadav’s combined figures reflect a deliberate India tactic: use the middle overs, when West Indies’ batters would otherwise be looking to accelerate, to apply consistent spin pressure from both ends. This match plan directly created the collapse that decided the result.
Bold opinion: India’s bowling attack in this match relied more on collective plan execution than any single standout spell. Four wickets for Patil at an economy above 9 might not look elite on paper, but combined with Yadav’s tighter figures, the pair created a squeeze that no individual bowling card fully captures.
What this warm-up match means for the World Cup proper
Both sides used this fixture explicitly as preparation, with India’s think tank getting a genuine look at how their spin options perform under chase pressure, and West Indies gaining useful data on their middle-order response to turn.
Practical lesson for reading warm-up results: a 26-run margin in a preparation match should be read as evidence of specific tactical patterns India’s spin plan, West Indies’ middle-order vulnerability against turn rather than as a definitive form guide for how either team will perform once the tournament begins.
Read Also:- Gujarat Titans Vs Chennai Super Kings Match Scorecard
Format Guardrail, Records and Tournament Context
Understanding the different India-West Indies Women fixtures
| Fixture | Format / competition | Correct use |
|---|---|---|
| India Women vs West Indies Women, T20 World Cup Warm-up (this article) | T20I warm-up match, Cardiff, June 2026 | This article’s core scorecard |
| West Indies Women in India, 2024-25 | Bilateral T20I series | Separate historical/format-specific article only |
| India Women vs West Indies Women, T20 World Cup Warm-up 2024 | An earlier World Cup cycle’s warm-up fixture | A completely different year and tournament cycle |
| India Women vs West Indies Women, ICC Women’s T20 World Cup (Cape Town) | 2023 T20 World Cup group-stage match | A different tournament, year, and format context entirely |
For example, in the 2023 ICC Women’s T20 World Cup group match at Cape Town, India Women beat West Indies Women by 6 wickets, chasing 118 with 119/4, built on Deepti Sharma’s 3/15 and Stafanie Taylor’s 42 for West Indies. These figures belong to an entirely different tournament and year, and must never be presented as part of this 2026 warm-up scorecard.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Ans. India Women won by 26 runs. India scored 179/8, and West Indies Women were restricted to 153/8 at Sophia Gardens, Cardiff.
Ans. India Women scored 179/8 in 20 overs, led by Bharti Fulmali’s unbeaten 56 and Smriti Mandhana’s 39. West Indies Women replied with 153/8, with Deandra Dottin’s 49 the top score, as India won by 26 runs.
Ans. Bharti Fulmali was the top scorer for India Women with an unbeaten 56 off 40 balls, anchoring the innings through the middle overs.
Ans. No. This was a warm-up match ahead of the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup 2026, not a group-stage or knockout fixture in the tournament itself.
Ans. Shreyanka Patil took the most wickets for India with 4/36, while Radha Yadav added 3/25, combining for seven of West Indies’ eight wickets.
