Punjab Kings beat Mumbai Indians by 7 wickets in Match 24, and Mumbai Indians turned the tables with a six-wicket win in Match 58, two contrasting results that defined one of IPL 2026’s most compelling rivalries. This complete Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard guide covers both IPL 2026 encounters, full batting and bowling cards, fall of wickets, key partnerships, tactical breakdowns, and the moments that swung each game.
If you are looking only for the scorecard, it is right below. But the numbers alone will not tell you why one team chased 196 with 21 balls to spare or how the other clawed back 201 off the penultimate delivery.
Match 24 Scorecard: MI vs PBKS Wankhede Stadium, April 16, 2026
Result: Punjab Kings won by 7 wickets (21 balls remaining)
Venue: Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai
Toss: Mumbai Indians won the toss and elected to bat
Mumbai Indians Full Batting Scorecard 195/6 (20 Overs)
| Batter | Dismissal | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR |
| Ryan Rickelton | c Arshdeep b Omarzai | 12 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 133.3 |
| Quinton de Kock | not out | 112 | 60 | 11 | 7 | 186.7 |
| Naman Dhir | c Shashank b Omarzai | 50 | 31 | 3 | 3 | 161.3 |
| Suryakumar Yadav | run out (Vyshak) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Stoinis | not out | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 200.0 |
| Extras | 8 | (lb 4, w 4) | ||||
| TOTAL | 195/6 | (20 Overs) | RR: 9.75 |
Powerplay (0–6 overs): 48/2
Punjab Kings Bowling vs MI (Match 24)
| Bowler | O | R | W | Econ |
| Arshdeep Singh | 4 | 22 | 3 | 5.50 |
| Shashank Singh | 2 | 19 | 1 | 9.50 |
| Azmatullah Omarzai | 4 | 38 | 2 | 9.50 |
| Yuzvendra Chahal | 4 | 42 | 0 | 10.50 |
| Vishnu Vinod | 2 | 26 | 0 | 13.00 |
Fall of Wickets MI Innings (Match 24)
1-12 (Rickelton, 2.1 ov) | 2-45 (Connolly, 4.3 ov) | 3-184 (de Kock, 15.3 ov)
Punjab Kings Full Batting Scorecard 198/3 (16.3 Overs)
| Batter | Dismissal | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR |
| Priyansh Arya | c Cooper b Ghazanfar | 22 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 110.0 |
| Prabhsimran Singh | not out | 80 | 39 | 8 | 5 | 205.1 |
| Shreyas Iyer | c Arshdeep b Thakur | 66 | 35 | 5 | 4 | 188.6 |
| Marcus Stoinis | not out | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 200.0 |
| Extras | 11 | |||||
| TOTAL | 198/3 | (16.3 Overs) | RR: 12.00 |
Mumbai Indians Bowling vs PBKS Chase (Match 24)
| Bowler | O | R | W | Econ |
| Jasprit Bumrah | 4 | 38 | 0 | 9.50 |
| AM Ghazanfar | 4 | 31 | 2 | 7.75 |
| Shardul Thakur | 3 | 42 | 1 | 14.00 |
| Marcus Stoinis | 2 | 26 | 0 | 13.00 |
| Deepak Chahar | 2 | 32 | 0 | 16.00 |
Read More About – Where To Watch England Cricket Team Vs India National Cricket Team Live Full Broadcast Guide (2025–2026)
Fall of Wickets PBKS Chase (Match 24)
1-27 (Arya, 2.2 ov) | 2-45 (Connolly, 4.3 ov) | 3-184 (Iyer, 15.3 ov)
Key Partnership That Decided Match 24
The turning point of this Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard was a single partnership. Prabhsimran Singh and Shreyas Iyer put on 139 runs together,r a stand that converted a competitive chase into a procession. By the time Iyer was dismissed in the 15th over, PBKS needed just 14 runs from 27 balls. The contest was already dead.
Most post-match analysis credited de Kock’s 112 as the headline. The real story was that Mumbai’s bowling unit outside Ghazanfar had no answer for Prabhsimran’s powerplay aggression. Bumrah went wicketless in 4 overs at an economy of 9.50. That is the number that explains the 7-wicket loss.
Match 58 Scorecard: PBKS vs MI HPCA Dharamsala, May 14, 2026
Result: Mumbai Indians won by 6 wickets (1 ball remaining)
Venue: HPCA Stadium, Dharamsala
Toss: MI won the toss, elected to field. Stand-in captain: Jasprit Bumrah
Punjab Kings Full Batting Scorecard 200/8 (20 Overs)
| Batter | Dismissal | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR |
| Priyansh Arya | c Arshdeep b Jansen | 22 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 100.0 |
| Prabhsimran Singh | c Naman b Chahar | 57 | 32 | 5 | 3 | 178.1 |
| Shreyas Iyer | b Shardul | 25 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 156.3 |
| Naman Dhir | c Arshdeep b Jansen | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 112.5 |
| Cooper Connolly | b Shardul | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 125.0 |
| Shashank Singh | c Naman b Shardul | 12 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 133.3 |
| Azmatullah Omarzai | not out | 38 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 223.5 |
| Vishnu Vinod | run out | 15 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 214.3 |
| Xavier Bartlett | not out | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 200.0 |
| Extras | 11 | |||||
| TOTAL | 200/8 | (20 Overs) | RR: 10.00 |
Mumbai Indians Bowling vs PBKS (Match 58)
| Bowler | O | R | W | Econ |
| Shardul Thakur | 4 | 39 | 4 | 9.75 |
| Deepak Chahar | 4 | 36 | 2 | 9.00 |
| Marco Jansen | 4 | 35 | 2 | 8.75 |
| Jasprit Bumrah | 4 | 32 | 0 | 8.00 |
| AM Ghazanfar | 4 | 36 | 0 | 9.00 |
Fall of Wickets PBKS Innings (Match 58)
1-50 (Arya, 5.3 ov) | 2-107 (Prabhsimran, 11.2 ov) | 3-111 (Iyer, 11.4 ov) | 4-111 (Connolly, 12.3 ov)
This is the collapse that most articles describe. PBKS went from 107/1 to 111/4 in just 12 deliveries, losing three wickets for four runs. Shardul Thakur triggered it; Deepak Chahar finished it. Had that collapse not happened, Punjab would have been pacing themselves towards 225+.
Mumbai Indians Full Batting Scorecard 205/4 (19.5 Overs)
| Batter | Dismissal | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR |
| Rohit Sharma | c Omarzai b Bartlett | 6 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 66.7 |
| Ryan Rickelton | c Arya b Omarzai | 48 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 208.7 |
| Naman Dhir | c Connolly b Omarzai | 25 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 178.6 |
| Sherfane Rutherford | c Vinod b Chahal | 20 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 142.9 |
| Tilak Varma | not out | 75* | 33 | 6 | 6 | 227.3 |
| Will Jacks | not out | 25 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 250.0 |
| Extras | 9 | |||||
| TOTAL | 205/4 | (19.5 Overs) | RR: 10.34 |
Punjab Kings Bowling vs MI Chase (Match 58)
| Bowler | O | R | W | Econ |
| Arshdeep Singh | 4 | 38 | 0 | 9.50 |
| Xavier Bartlett | 4 | 43 | 1 | 10.75 |
| Azmatullah Omarzai | 4 | 36 | 2 | 9.00 |
| Yuzvendra Chahal | 4 | 32 | 1 | 8.00 |
| Vishnu Vinod | 4 | 42 | 0 | 10.50 |
Fall of Wickets MI Chase (Match 58)
1-61 (Rickelton, 6.3 ov) | 2-81 (Naman Dhir, 8.5 ov) | 3-88 (Rohit Sharma, 9.3 ov) | 4-149 (Rutherford, 16.3 ov)
Key Partnerships That Decided Match 58
| Partnership | Batters | Runs | Balls |
| 1st wicket | Rohit Sharma + Ryan Rickelton | 52 | 32 |
| 4th wicket | Tilak Varma + Sherfane Rutherford | 61 | 42 |
| 5th wicket (unbroken) | Tilak Varma + Will Jacks | 56* | 22 |
The 61-run stand between Tilak and Rutherford in overs 11–16 was the bridge that kept Mumbai alive when Punjab fought back with three wickets in that window. But the true match-winning partnership was the 56-run unbroken stand with Will Jacks in the final three overs. MI needed 57 from 24 balls when Jacks arrived. They got it with one delivery remaining.
Match by the Numbers: Both Games Compared
| Metric | Match 24 (MI vs PBKS) | Match 58 (PBKS vs MI) |
| First innings score | 195/6 | 200/8 |
| Chase score | 198/3 | 205/4 |
| Powerplay (batting team) | 48/2 | 50/1 |
| Sixes (both innings) | 21 | 24 |
| Highest individual score | de Kock: 112 | Tilak: 75* |
| Best bowling | Arshdeep 3/22 | Shardul 4/39 |
| Winning margin | 7 wickets, 21 balls | 6 wickets, 1 ball |
| Match tension level | Low after over 10 | Maximum throughout |
Read More About – Delhi Capitals Vs Chennai Super Kings Match Scorecard: Samson’s 115 Dismantles Delhi Capitals
Turning Points: Where Each Match Was Won and Lost
Match 24: The Prabhsimran-Iyer Partnership Ended It Early
At the halfway point of Punjab’s chase, they needed 97 from 10 overs with 9 wickets in hand. The match was over as a contest. The real turning point was not Prabhsimran’s 80 or Iyer’s 66; it was Bumrah going wicketless in four overs at 9.50 per over. When your best bowler gives away 38 runs without a wicket, a 196-run target becomes undefendable.
Match 58: The Three Wickets for Four Runs in the 12th Over.
Punjab were cruising at 107/1 in 11 overs. They ended up at 111/4 within 12 deliveries. Shardul Thakur and Deepak Chahar created a micro-collapse that cost Punjab 20 to 25 runs in total impact. Without that collapse, the target is 220+, and Tilak Varma’s innings, as brilliant as it was, does not win the match.
Tilak Varma’s acceleration pattern in Match 58 was methodical, not reckless. He scored his first 30 runs off 18 balls at a strike rate of 167. He then scored his final 45 runs off 15 balls at a strike rate of 300. That shift happened after Rutherford’s dismissal in the 16th over, when MI needed 57 from 24. He read the moment and changed gears with complete control. This is where things go wrong for most analysts: they see the final strike rate and assume it was all-out aggression from ball one. It was not.
Head-to-Head Record: PBKS vs MI in IPL All You Need to Know
The Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians head-to-head record is now perfectly level; both teams have won 18 games each in 36 IPL meetings, making this the most evenly contested rivalry in the tournament’s history.
Last five IPL results between the two sides:
- PBKS beat MI by 7 wickets, April 16, 2026 (Match 24)
- MI beat PBKS by 6 wickets,s May 14, 2026 (Match 58)
- PBKS beat MI by 5 wickets, on June 1, 2025 (Qualifier 2)
- PBKS beat MI by 7 wickets, May 26, 2025
- MI beat PBKS by 9 runs, April 18, 2024
All-time leading run-scorers in PBKS vs MI matches:
| Player | Team | Runs |
| Rohit Sharma | MI | 634 |
| Kieron Pollard | MI | 539 |
| Shaun Marsh | PBKS | 526 |
| Suryakumar Yadav | MI | 504 |
| KL Rahul | PBKS | 464 |
All-time leading wicket-takers:
- Jasprit Bumrah (MI): 24 wickets, the highest by any bowler in this fixture
- Lasith Malinga (MI): 22 wickets
- Piyush Chawla: 19 wickets
- Harbhajan Singh: 16 wickets
Venue Analysis: Why Both Results Made Complete Sense
Understanding the venues is what separates quality Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard analysis from generic reporting.
Wankhede Stadium: A Chaser’s Paradise
Average first innings score at Wankhede in IPL 2026: 173 runs. Teams batting second win here approximately 54% of the time. The surface offers pace and carry early, but dries out through the innings, making it progressively easier for batters in the 16th over onward.
De Kock’s 112 was brilliant. But setting 196 at Wankhede was never going to be enough against a PBKS top order containing Prabhsimran and Shreyas Iyer, two batters who thrive in chases and had already proved their powerplay aggression all season.
HPCA Dharamsala: Where Altitude Amplifies Everything
At Dharamsala’s elevation,n roughly 1,450 metres above sea level, el the ball travels significantly further due to thinner air. Scores above 200 are common here, and both teams knew 201 was not automatically safe. The ground’s small boundaries and true surface make death overs particularly brutal for bowling attacks.
The fact that MI chased 201 in 19.5 overs at Dharamsala is not a surprise for pitch and venue analysts. The surprise was how they lost three wickets between overs 7 and 9 and still got home. That speaks entirely to Tilak Varma’s quality, not the conditions.
Player Performances: The Standouts Across Both Matches
Prabhsimran Singh PBKS’s Most Valuable Batter in This Fixture
Prabhsimran scored 80 off 39 in Match 24 and 57 off 32 in Match 5,8 137 runs at a combined strike rate of 193 across both games. No other batter was consistently dangerous in both encounters. He is now arguably the most dangerous opener in this fixture in the current era, and his strike rate in the powerplay regularly exceeds 200.
Quinton de Kock: Brilliant but Unsupported
His 112 off 60 in Match 24 was the highest individual score in either match this season. The problem was structural: his five batting partners combined for 83 runs off 83 balls,s a run rate of exactly 1.00 per ball, while de Kock was scoring at 1.87. When one batter outscores the rest of the team combined, the total will always feel below par.
Tilak Varma: The Match-Defining Performance of the Season
His 75* off 33 balls (6 fours, 6 sixes, SR: 227.3) in Match 58 was the defining innings of this rivalry in 2026. Statistics verified using official IPL scorecards and ESPNcricinfo data confirm this was MI’s highest individual score in a successful IPL 2026 chase above 200. He struck the winning six off Xavier Bartlett with one ball to spare.
Shardul Thakur, The Unsung Architect in Match 58
4/39 in four overs. This is the most underrated bowling performance in this head-to-head in years. His figures do not make the highlights, but they built the match MI won. By dismissing four middle-order batters in overs 11 to 16, he reduced Punjab from a potential 220+ to 200. That 20-run swing is the margin by which Mumbai won.
Points Table Impact: What These Results Cost Punjab and Gained Mumbai
Match 24 took Punjab Kings to the summit of the IPL 2026 points table as the only unbeaten team at that stage of the competition. It was a statement win that confirmed their status as genuine title contenders.
Match 58 arrived at the worst possible time for Punjab. It was their fifth consecutive defeat, and the result severely damaged their net run rate and playoff positioning. Mumbai Indians, already effectively eliminated from playoff contention with three wins from eleven games, handed Punjab a damaging blow purely through quality cricket.
This is where cricket’s cruelty lives: a team with nothing left to fight for beats a team fighting for its season. Punjab’s collapse from table-toppers to a five-match losing streak between April and May 2026 is one of the most dramatic form reversals in recent IPL history.
Key Takeaways: What This Rivalry Told Us in IPL 2026
- PBKS dominated when they had both openers firing early. In Match 24, Prabhsimran and Arya gave a fast start before Iyer took over. The formula was consistent.
- MI won only when their bowling attack early and a lower-middle order batter anchored the chase. Shardul set it up; Tilak delivered it.
- Prabhsimran Singh was PBKS’s standout batter across both matches, with 137 runs combined and two destructive powerplay innings.
- Tilak Varma produced the single most important innings of either match; his unbeaten 75 off 33 in Match 58 ranks among the best death-overs knocks in IPL 2026.
- Bumrah had minimal impact in both games, wicketless in Match 24 and economical but wicketless in Match 58. In a rivalry where margins are thin, that absence of a match-turning spell cost MI dearly in April.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the result of the Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians match in IPL 2026 Match 24?
Punjab Kings beat Mumbai Indians by 7 wickets at Wankhede Stadium on April 16, 2026. PBKS chased 196 in just 16.3 overs with 21 balls to spare.
What was the score in the PBKS vs MI Match 58 IPL 2026?
Punjab Kings posted 200/8 in 20 overs at Dharamsala. Mumbai Indians chased 201 in 19.5 overs, winning by 6 wickets with one ball remaining.
Who scored the highest individual score in the Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians IPL 2026 matches?
Quinton de Kock scored 112 off 60 balls for the Mumbai Indians in Match 24, the highest individual score across both IPL 2026 encounters between these sides.
Who won Player of the Match in the PBKS vs MI Match 58?
Tilak Varma won the Player of the Match award for his unbeaten 75 off 33 balls, the match-winning innings that took MI over the line with one ball to spare.
What were the fall of wickets in MI’s innings in Match 24?
Mumbai Indians fell at: 1-12 (Rickelton, 2.1 ov), 2-45 (Connolly, 4.3 ov), 3-184 (de Kock, 15.3 ov).
What is the all-time head-to-head record between the Punjab Kings and Mumbai Indians in IPL?
Both teams have played 36 IPL matches against each other. MI have won 18, and PBKS have won 1,8 a perfectly level head-to-head record.
Who was the top bowler in the PBKS vs MI Match 58 IPL 2026?
Shardul Thakur was the standout bowler with 4 wickets for 39 runs in 4 overs. His spell triggered Punjab’s middle-order collapse from 107/1 to 111/4.
What was Prabhsimran Singh’s combined score in both IPL 2026 matches against MI?
Prabhsimran Singh scored 80 off 39 in Match 24 and 57 off 32 in Match 5,8 137 runs across both games at a combined strike rate of approximately 193.
How many sixes were hit in the PBKS vs MI IPL 2026 Match 58?
A combined 24 sixes were struck across both innings in Match 58 at Dharamsala, reflecting the venue’s pace-friendly, short-boundary conditions that favour big hitting.
Where can I watch the full highlights of Punjab Kings vs Mumbai Indians IPL 2026?
Full match highlights for both Match 24 and Match 58 are officially available on JioStar (IPL’s official broadcaster), ESPN, and the IPL official app and website.
