West Indies won the toss and chose to bowl first in Dubai. That decision looked sound for exactly seven overs. Then Darwish Rasooli and Sediqullah Atal took the game away from them, and Mujeeb Ur Rahman finished it with a hat-trick that sealed both the match and the series.
Afghanistan beat West Indies by 39 runs in the second T20I of their 2026 series in the UAE, posting 189 for 4 before bowling the tourists out for 150 in 18.5 overs. The win handed Afghanistan an unassailable 2-0 series lead with one match still to play, and it set up a result that West Indies would later avenge, but only after this defeat had already done the damage.
Here’s the real problem with most Afghanistan vs West Indies scorecard pages: they present two totals and a margin, then stop. They don’t explain how West Indies lost three top-order wickets while adding almost nothing to the score, why Mujeeb’s hat-trick mattered more than his three wickets suggest, or how a team leading 2-0 in a series still went on to lose the decider days later. This breakdown covers all of it.
Match Summary: Afghanistan vs West Indies, 2nd T20I, 2026
| Match detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | Afghanistan vs West Indies, 2nd T20I, Afghanistan v West Indies in UAE, 2026 |
| Date | January 21, 2026 |
| Venue | Dubai International Cricket Stadium, Dubai |
| Toss | West Indies won the toss and chose to field |
| Afghanistan score | 189/4 in 20 overs |
| West Indies score | 150 all out in 18.5 overs |
| Result | Afghanistan won by 39 runs |
| Player of the Match | Mujeeb Ur Rahman |
| Series impact | Afghanistan took an unassailable 2-0 lead in the 3-match series |
Quick answer: Afghanistan beat West Indies by 39 runs in the second T20I of their 2026 series in Dubai, defending 189 for 4 as West Indies were bowled out for 150. Mujeeb Ur Rahman was Player of the Match after taking a hat-trick that broke West Indies’ middle order.
Full Scorecard at a Glance
Afghanistan innings: 189/4 in 20 overs
| Batter | Contribution | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Darwish Rasooli | Half-century | Anchored the innings through the middle overs |
| Sediqullah Atal | Half-century | Built the powerplay platform alongside the top order |
| Ibrahim Zadran | Contributing innings | Continued his strong run of form from the series opener |
Afghanistan reached 50 runs in just 5.4 overs and were 85 for 2 at the halfway mark, showing an innings built on early intent rather than a slow build followed by a late surge.
| West Indies bowler | Notable figures | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Jayden Seales | Wicket-taking spell | Provided the only real breakthroughs against the set batters |
| Gudakesh Motie | Economical overs | Applied control through the middle phase |
Read Also:- United States National Cricket Team Vs Namibia National Cricket Team Match Scorecard
West Indies innings: 150 all out in 18.5 overs
| Batter | Fall of wicket | Score/Over |
|---|---|---|
| Alick Athanaze | 1st wicket | 9 runs, 2.5 overs |
| Evin Lewis | 2nd wicket | 38 runs, 7.5 overs |
| Johnson Charles | 3rd wicket | 38 runs, 7.6 overs |
| Shimron Hetmyer | 4th wicket | 106 runs, 13.3 overs |
| Brandon King | 5th wicket | 122 runs, 15.1 overs |
| Ramon Simmonds | Final wicket | 150 all out, 18.5 overs |
| Afghanistan bowler | Overs | Runs | Wickets | Economy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fazalhaq Farooqi | 3.5 | 28 | 2 | 7.3 |
| Mujeeb Ur Rahman | 4 | — | 3 | — |
The number that decides this scorecard: West Indies lost their second and third wickets on the same score, 38 runs, one ball apart. That double-strike in the space of a single delivery is the real turning point of the innings, not the eventual 39-run margin.
How Afghanistan Won: Turning Points
1. Rasooli and Atal’s fifties built an innings with no slow phase
Afghanistan reached 50 in 5.4 overs and 85 for 2 by the halfway stage. That is not a total built on a cautious start followed by late hitting. It is a total built on sustained pressure from over one to over twenty, with Rasooli and Atal’s half-centuries forming the spine of an innings that never allowed West Indies’ bowlers to settle into a defensive rhythm.
What people think vs reality: viewers often assume a 189 in T20 cricket comes from one explosive finishing over. Reality: Afghanistan’s total came from consistent scoring through every phase, which is harder for a bowling side to defend against, because there’s no single passage of overs they can point to as “the one that got away.” Every phase contributed roughly equally.
2. West Indies’ identical-score double wicket killed their momentum
Losing Evin Lewis and Johnson Charles both at 38 runs, one ball apart, is the kind of moment a standard scorecard reduces to two lines in a fall-of-wickets table. In reality, it meant West Indies had to rebuild their entire innings twice in the space of one delivery, with the required rate climbing sharply at exactly the point they needed stability.
Counterintuitive idea: commentators often blame a chasing team’s death-overs collapse for a heavy defeat. Here, the match was arguably lost in the middle overs. By the time Hetmyer fell at 106 in the 13th over, West Indies were already required to score at a rate their remaining batters could not sustain against Afghanistan’s spin attack.
3. Mujeeb’s hat-trick was a statement, not a stat
Mujeeb Ur Rahman’s hat-trick came at a stage when West Indies still had recognized batters in the middle order who could, in theory, have rebuilt the innings. Removing three set or in-form players in three consecutive deliveries doesn’t just take wickets. It removes the opposition’s ability to plan a recovery, because every remaining batter now has to walk in facing a hat-trick ball.
Common mistake in reading bowling performances: treating “3 wickets” as automatically less impressive than “4 wickets.” A hat-trick at a specific pressure point, breaking a team’s only realistic route back into the game, can be more match-defining than a four-wicket haul spread across an already-lost cause. Context decides value, not the raw wicket count.
Player Performance Breakdown
| Player | Team | Key contribution | Match impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Darwish Rasooli | Afghanistan | Half-century | Provided the innings’ middle-overs foundation |
| Sediqullah Atal | Afghanistan | Half-century | Set the tone alongside the top order from over one |
| Mujeeb Ur Rahman | Afghanistan | Hat-trick, 3 wickets | Player of the Match; ended West Indies’ recovery chances instantly |
| Fazalhaq Farooqi | Afghanistan | 2/28 in 3.5 overs | Provided early control and the platform for the death-overs squeeze |
| Shimron Hetmyer | West Indies | Longest resistance, out at 106 | Only batter to build real time in the middle overs |
| Brandon King | West Indies | Captain’s innings, out at 122 | Fell attempting to accelerate against an established required rate |
Mujeeb Ur Rahman: the match’s decisive weapon
Mujeeb’s Player of the Match award wasn’t close. A hat-trick in a run-chase, arriving at the exact moment a team needs its middle order to build partnerships rather than lose wickets in clusters, is one of the most disruptive events in white-ball cricket. It denies the batting side any sense of rhythm and forces new batters to walk out under maximum pressure.
Bold opinion: Mujeeb’s spell mattered more to this result than either half-century in Afghanistan’s innings. A total of 189 gives a bowling attack room to work with, but it still needs to be defended. Mujeeb’s hat-trick is what actually converted a “defendable total” into a comfortable 39-run win, and that conversion is the harder skill to execute under pressure.
Darwish Rasooli and Sediqullah Atal: the platform-builders
Both batters scored half-centuries, and together they ensured Afghanistan never had to rely on a late flourish to reach a competitive total.
This partnership-driven approach reflects a broader pattern in this Afghanistan side: rather than depending on one destructive finisher, they build totals through multiple contributors reaching fifty, which makes their totals harder to predict and harder to bowl at.
Practical lesson for analysing totals: when a total is built by two or three fifties rather than one century, it usually means the bowling side never had a specific batter to target with a defensive plan. Spreading risk across the order, as Afghanistan did here, is a repeatable team strategy, not a one-match fluke.
Shimron Hetmyer and Brandon King: partial resistance, no partnership
Hetmyer’s innings, ending at the fall of the fourth wicket with the score on 106, was West Indies’ best individual effort at rebuilding the chase. King’s departure at 122 in the 15th over ended any realistic hope of a recovery. Neither batter lacked application.
The problem was structural: with two wickets already lost cheaply at the same score early on, every remaining partnership had to do double the repair work just to get back on terms.
Key Moments and Match Timeline
| Phase | Key moment | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan innings, overs 1–6 | Afghanistan reach 50 in 5.4 overs | Sets an aggressive tone from ball one |
| Afghanistan innings, overs 7–20 | Rasooli and Atal build twin fifties | Total climbs to a defendable 189 without a slow patch |
| West Indies innings, overs 3–8 | Athanaze, Lewis and Charles all fall inside single figures to 38 | Chase structurally compromised before the halfway mark |
| West Indies innings, overs 9–14 | Hetmyer briefly stabilises to 106 | Best chance of a recovery, ultimately insufficient |
| West Indies innings, overs 15–19 | King departs at 122, Mujeeb’s hat-trick follows | Match and series effectively sealed |
Read Also:- India National Cricket Team Vs Bangladesh National Cricket Team Matches
The most useful visual for this scorecard isn’t a run-rate line graph. It’s a wicket-cluster diagram showing three West Indies wickets falling for just 38 runs, followed by Mujeeb’s three-ball hat-trick later in the innings. Those two clusters, not the 39-run final margin, are the real story of the match.
Series Context: A 2-0 Lead That Didn’t Hold
This win gave Afghanistan an unassailable 2-0 lead in the three-match series, following their 38-run win in the series opener where Ibrahim Zadran’s unbeaten 87 and Darwish Rasooli’s 84 had powered a total of 181 for 3. With the series already secured, Afghanistan rotated their squad for the dead-rubber third T20I, and West Indies responded by winning that final match by 13 runs, with Shamar Springer taking 4 for 20 and being named Player of the Series went to Darwish Rasooli despite the loss.
Practical takeaway for readers tracking form: a 2-0 series lead with a match to spare often leads to squad rotation, and that rotation can change the tone of the final scoreline completely. Don’t read a dead-rubber result as representative of the series’ balance of power. The second T20I, decided on merit by both sides at full strength, is the more accurate measure of the gap between these two teams at that point in time.
